How ReverseCensorship approaches claims, source comparison, and confidence levels.
Identify the exact narrative, assertion, or framing move being examined.
Compare headlines, official statements, open-source evidence, and public records.
Build timelines, collect background records, and surface omitted variables.
Separate confirmed findings from plausible inferences and unresolved gaps.
State clearly where evidence is partial, contested, or unavailable.
Avoid sensationalism. Let structure, evidence, and clarity do the work.
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| High | Supported by direct documentation, multiple strong sources, or verified records. |
| Medium | Likely, but still dependent on partial evidence or interpretation. |
| Low | Open question, weak sourcing, or unresolved contradiction. |